Current:Home > NewsAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -Quantum Capital Pro
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-15 17:24:40
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (148)
Related
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- What the DOJ lawsuit against Apple could mean for consumers
- How one group is helping New York City students reverse pandemic learning loss
- Justice Department sues Apple for allegedly monopolizing the smartphone market
- Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Deep Red
- Bus hijacked in downtown Los Angeles collides with several vehicles and crashes into a hotel
- Angela Chao Case: Untangling the Mystery Surrounding the Billionaire's Death
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- California homelessness measure’s razor-thin win signals growing voter fatigue
Ranking
- McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
- Did grocery chains take advantage of COVID shortages to raise prices? FTC says yes
- A fifth Albuquerque, New Mexico, police officer has resigned amid probe of unit
- Idaho manhunt: Escaped Idaho inmate's handcuffs tie him to double-murder scene, police say
- Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
- Activists rally for bill that would allow some Alabama death row inmates to be resentenced
- Reports attach Margot Robbie to new 'Sims' movie: Here's what we know
- What to know about Duquesne after its NCAA men's tournament upset of Brigham Young
Recommendation
Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
Democratic senators push bill focusing on local detainment of immigrants linked to violent crime
Idaho suspected shooter and escaped inmate both in custody after manhunt, officials say
Viral ad campaign challenges perceptions for World Down Syndrome Day 2024
Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
11-year-old boy fatally stabbed protecting pregnant mother in Chicago home invasion
More than 440,000 Starbucks mugs recalled after reports of injuries from overheating and breakage
What the DOJ lawsuit against Apple could mean for consumers