Current:Home > MyExxon Relents, Wipes Oil Sands Reserves From Its Books -Quantum Capital Pro
Exxon Relents, Wipes Oil Sands Reserves From Its Books
View
Date:2025-04-11 21:14:23
ExxonMobil announced Wednesday that it had wiped off its books all 3.5 billion barrels of tar sands oil reserves at one of its projects in Canada. Because of recent low oil prices, the company said none of those reserves can be considered economical according to the accounting rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The accounting change at its Kearl project, a momentous if expected development, represented a turnaround for the company, which has long resisted calls to revise its reserves estimates. Over the past decade, Exxon had steadily increased its holdings in Canada’s tar sands to become a leading producer there.
Exxon also removed from its books 800 million barrels of oil-equivalent reserves in North America, though the reductions were offset by the addition of 1 billion barrels of oil and gas elsewhere.
Exxon said in October that low prices would likely force it to “de-book” up to 4.6 billion barrels of reserves in its end-of-year accounting. Securities and Exchange Commission rules allow oil companies to count reserves only if they are profitable based on average prices over the previous year.
But while the accounting change removes billions of dollars worth of tar sands investments from the company’s annual report, and is watched closely by investors, it will not directly affect operations. Exxon plans to continue operating its Kearl project, and said it will add back the reserves if oil prices rise or costs drop. After the reduction, the company now reports holding 1.3 billion barrels of tar sands reserves.
Exxon will hold an analyst meeting on March 1.
Earlier this week, ConocoPhillips said it had reduced its oil sands reserves by more than 1 billion barrels, bringing its total to 1.2 billion for 2016. These moves had been expected, as low oil prices have placed a heavy burden on tar sands projects, which are among the most expensive and polluting sources of oil.
veryGood! (1312)
Related
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- Benefits of Investing in Climate Adaptation Far Outweigh Costs, Commission Says
- Beyoncé's Makeup Artist Sir John Shares His Best-Kept Beauty Secrets
- WWE Wrestling Champ Sara Lee's Cause of Death Revealed
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- Outcry Prompts Dominion to Make Coal Ash Wastewater Cleaner
- Property Rights Outcry Stops Billion-Dollar Pipeline Project in Georgia
- Today’s Climate: July 13, 2010
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- State legislative races are on the front lines of democracy this midterm cycle
Ranking
- The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
- Wildfire smoke causes flight delays across Northeast. Here's what to know about the disruptions.
- Second woman says Ga. Republican Senate candidate Herschel Walker paid for abortion
- This urban mosquito threatens to derail the fight against malaria in Africa
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- Cory Booker on Climate Change: Where the Candidate Stands
- What is the Air Quality Index, the tool used to tell just how bad your city's air is?
- Two-thirds of Americans now have a dim view of tipping, survey shows
Recommendation
Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
What it's like being an abortion doula in a state with restrictive laws
They inhaled asbestos for decades on the job. Now, workers break their silence
Get $200 Worth of Peter Thomas Roth Anti-Aging Skincare for Just $38
EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
Many Man-Made Earthquakes in Western Canada Can Now Be Linked to Fracking
Paying for mental health care leaves families in debt and isolated
Fracking Study Finds Toxins in Wyoming Town’s Groundwater and Raises Broader Concerns