Current:Home > reviewsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -Quantum Capital Pro
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-14 03:08:21
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (6375)
Related
- McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
- Luigi Mangione Case: Why McDonald's Employee Who Reported Him Might Not Get $60,000 Reward
- Stop & Shop is using grocery store kiosks to make digital
- Southern California forecast of cool temps, calm winds to help firefighters battle Malibu blaze
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- Luigi Mangione Case: Why McDonald's Employee Who Reported Him Might Not Get $60,000 Reward
- Shanghai bear cub Junjun becomes breakout star
- The brewing recovery in Western North Carolina
- NHL in ASL returns, delivering American Sign Language analysis for Deaf community at Winter Classic
- 'Mary': How to stream, what biblical experts think about Netflix's new coming
Ranking
- Small twin
- The Sundance Film Festival unveils its lineup including Jennifer Lopez, Questlove and more
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Dropping Hints
- Supreme Court allows investors’ class action to proceed against microchip company Nvidia
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- I loved to hate pop music, until Chappell Roan dragged me back
- North Carolina announces 5
- Shanghai bear cub Junjun becomes breakout star
Recommendation
Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
Jim Leach, former US representative from Iowa, dies at 82
Wisconsin kayaker who faked his death and fled to Eastern Europe is in custody, online records show
Lil Durk suspected of funding a 2022 murder as he seeks jail release in separate case
Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
Drew Barrymore has been warned to 'back off' her guests after 'touchy' interviews
Michael Bublé Details Heartwarming Moment With Taylor Swift’s Parents at Eras Tour
A Malibu wildfire prompts evacuation orders and warnings for 20,000, including Dick Van Dyke, Cher