Current:Home > StocksU.S. appeals court preserves partial access to abortion pill, but with tighter rules -Quantum Capital Pro
U.S. appeals court preserves partial access to abortion pill, but with tighter rules
View
Date:2025-04-14 00:27:05
A federal appeals court will allow partial access to the abortion drug mifepristone while a high-profile federal case plays out, but with new limitations on how the drug can be dispensed.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit says the drug, used in most medication abortions in the United States, remains approved for use up to seven weeks of pregnancy while the case is being appealed.
Previously, the drug was approved for up to 10 weeks. The ruling also says mifepristone can no longer be sent in the mail at least for now.
The Biden administration says it will appeal the Fifth Circuit's decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Late last week, U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk sided with anti-abortion rights groups that sued the Food and Drug Administration over its approval of the abortion pill mifepristone. He issued a ruling that would invalidate the drug's approval beginning this Friday unless the appeals court intervenes.
On Monday, the Department of Justice asked the Fifth Circuit for an emergency stay of Kacsmaryk's decision while the court hears the case. In their request, Justice Department lawyers argued that "the district court upended decades of reliance by blocking FDA's approval of mifepristone and depriving patients of access to this safe and effective treatment, based on the court's own misguided assessment of the drug's safety."
Mifepristone was approved by the FDA in 2000 and is now used in combination with another drug, misoprostol, in nearly all medication abortions in the United States. Mifepristone was initially approved for medication abortion through seven weeks of pregnancy, but in 2016, the FDA expanded that to 10 weeks.
The appeals court's decision means mifepristone will continue to be at least partially available while the case plays out.
It's unclear how the latest decision will interact with a ruling in a separate federal case in Washington state, filed by attorneys general from 17 states and the District of Columbia who are seeking to preserve access to the pills.
In that decision, also issued Friday shortly after Kacsmaryk released his ruling, U.S. District Judge Thomas O. Rice said the FDA was prohibited from "altering the status quo and rights as it relates to the availability of Mifepristone."
Washington state Attorney General Bob Ferguson, one of the leaders of that effort, told NPR he believes it will preserve access to mifepristone for people in those 17 states and D.C., unless a higher court says otherwise.
The Justice Department also filed a motion Monday asking Rice to clarify the meaning of his ruling, given there appears to be "tension" with Kacsmaryk's nationwide injunction.
On Thursday evening, Rice issued an order affirming that for the 17 states and D.C. — the parties in the case before him — access to mifepristone should remain unchanged, regardless of the Texas judge's injunction and the Fifth Circuit's decision. So these cases remain on a collision course.
A Supreme Court decision could clarify the path forward.
Meanwhile, several states led by Democratic governors have begun stockpiling abortion pills — either mifepristone or another drug, misoprostol. Misoprostol is usually used in combination with mifepristone but can be used alone to induce abortion.
Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey and Washington Gov. Jay Inslee have announced that their states have begun stockpiling mifepristone in the event that access is disrupted. California Gov. Gavin Newsom and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul say their states are stockpiling tens of thousands of doses of misoprostol.
veryGood! (12564)
Related
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- Roger Goodell pushes back on claims NFL scripted Super Bowl 58 for Taylor Swift sideshow
- Less rain forecast but historic Southern California storm still threatens flooding and landslides
- Whoopi Goldberg counters Jay-Z blasting Beyoncé snubs: 32 Grammys 'not a terrible number!'
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- South Dakota man charged with murder for allegedly running down chief deputy during police chase
- Pennsylvania governor’s budget could see significant payments to schools, economic development
- Kansas City Chiefs' Travis Kelce at Super Bowl Opening Night: Taylor Swift is 'unbelievable'
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Grammy Awards ratings hit a sweet note as almost 17 million tune in, up 34% from 2023
Ranking
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
- Namibian President Hage Geingob, anti-apartheid activist turned statesman, dies at age 82
- The Real Reason Vanderpump Rules' Ariana Madix Won't Let Tom Sandoval Buy Their House
- Maurice Sendak delights children with new book, 12 years after his death
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Ohio attorney general opposes speeding up timeline for lawsuit over proposed voting rights amendment
- Better equipment and communications are among Maui police recommendations after Lahaina wildfire
- Shane Gillis was fired from 'Saturday Night Live' for racist jokes. Now he's hosting.
Recommendation
Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
Taylor Swift’s Tortured Poets Department Tracklist Seemingly Hints at Joe Alwyn Breakup Songs
15 Toner Sprays to Refresh, Revitalize & Hydrate Your Face All Day Long
A famous climate scientist is in court, with big stakes for attacks on science
Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
Ship targeted in suspected Yemen Houthi rebel drone attack in southern Red Sea as tensions high
New Mexico Republicans vie to challenge incumbent senator and reclaim House swing district
South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem banned from tribal land over U.S.-Mexico border comments: Blatant disrespect