Current:Home > StocksKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -Quantum Capital Pro
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-17 03:29:20
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (33)
Related
- Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
- Alabama Barker Shares Her Dear Aunt Has Been Diagnosed With Brain Cancer
- How facial recognition technology is transforming travel efficiency and security
- Ja’Marr Chase, Tee Higgins absent as Cincinnati Bengals begin organized team activities
- The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
- Appeals court orders new trial for man convicted of killing star Minneapolis student athlete
- A working group that emerged from a tragedy sets out to reform child welfare services
- Darius Rucker talks family trauma, drug use and fate: 'The best revenge is success'
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- Cara Delevingne and Jeremy Pope Strip Down for Calvin Klein’s Steamy New Pride Campaign Video
Ranking
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- Lightning strike kills Colorado cattle rancher, 34 of his herd; wife, father-in-law survive
- Cross restored to Notre Dame cathedral more than 5 years after fire
- Stars' Jason Robertson breaks slump with Game 3 hat trick in win against Oilers
- Charges tied to China weigh on GM in Q4, but profit and revenue top expectations
- Ja’Marr Chase, Tee Higgins absent as Cincinnati Bengals begin organized team activities
- How a California rescue farm is helping animals and humans heal from trauma
- Appeals court upholds retired NYPD officer’s 10-year prison sentence for Capitol riot attack
Recommendation
Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
The small town life beckons for many as Americans continue to flee big cities
Driver charged with DUI-manslaughter for farmworkers’ bus crash in Florida now faces more charges
Three people shot to death in tiny South Dakota town; former mayor charged
Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
Book Review: So you think the culture wars are new? Shakespeare expert James Shapiro begs to differ
Jan. 6 officers to campaign for Biden in battleground states
House Democrats expected to vote on $53.1B budget as Republicans complains of overspending