Current:Home > MyWisconsin Supreme Court to decide whether mobile voting vans can be used in future elections -Quantum Capital Pro
Wisconsin Supreme Court to decide whether mobile voting vans can be used in future elections
View
Date:2025-04-14 16:01:46
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The Wisconsin Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments Tuesday in a case brought by Republicans who want to bar the use of mobile voting vans in the presidential battleground state.
Such vans — a single van, actually — were used just once, in Racine in 2022. It allowed voters to cast absentee ballots in the two weeks leading up to the election. Racine, the Democratic National Committee and others say nothing in state law prohibits the use of voting vans.
Whatever the court decides will not affect the November election, as a ruling isn’t expected until later and no towns or cities asked to use alternative voting locations for this election before the deadline to do so passed. But the ruling will determine whether mobile voting sites can be used in future elections.
Republicans argue it is against state law to operate mobile voting sites, that their repeated use would increase the chances of voter fraud, and that the one in Racine was used to bolster Democratic turnout.
Wisconsin law prohibits locating any early voting site in a place that gives an advantage to any political party. There are other limitations on early voting sites, including a requirement that they be “as near as practicable” to the clerk’s office.
For the 2022 election, Racine city Clerk Tara McMenamin and the city “had a goal of making voting accessible to as many eligible voters as possible, and the voting locations were as close as practicable to the municipal clerk’s office while achieving that goal and complying with federal law,” the city’s attorney argued in filings with the court.
Racine purchased its van with grant money from the Center for Tech and Civic Life, a nonprofit funded by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife. Republicans have been critical of the grants, calling the money “Zuckerbucks” that they say was used to tilt turnout in Democratic areas.
Wisconsin voters in April approved a constitutional amendment banning the use of private money to help run elections.
The van was used only to facilitate early in-person voting during the two weeks prior to an election, McMenamin said. She said the vehicle was useful because it was becoming too cumbersome for her staff to set up their equipment in remote polling sites.
It traveled for two weeks across the city, allowing voters to cast in-person absentee ballots in 21 different locations.
Racine County Republican Party Chairman Ken Brown, represented by the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, filed a complaint the day after the August 2022 primary with the Wisconsin Elections Commission, arguing that the van was against state law. He argued that it was only sent to Democratic areas in the city in an illegal move to bolster turnout.
McMenamin disputed those accusations, saying that it shows a misunderstanding of the city’s voting wards, which traditionally lean Democratic.
“Whether McMenamin’s intention was to create this turnout advantage for Democrats or not, that is precisely what she did through the sites she selected,” Brown argued in a brief filed with the state Supreme Court.
The elections commission dismissed the complaint four days before the 2022 election, saying there was no probable cause shown to believe the law had been broken. Brown sued.
What to know about the 2024 Election
- Today’s news: Follow live updates from the campaign trail from the AP.
- Ground Game: Sign up for AP’s weekly politics newsletter to get it in your inbox every Monday.
- AP’s Role: The Associated Press is the most trusted source of information on election night, with a history of accuracy dating to 1848. Learn more.
Brown sued, and in January, a Racine County Circuit Court judge sided with Republicans, ruling that state election laws do not allow for the use of mobile voting sites.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court in June kept that ruling in place pending its consideration of the case, which effectively meant the use of mobile voting sites would not be allowed in the upcoming presidential election. The court also kept in place the same rules that have been in place since 2016 for determining the location of early voting sites. The deadline for selecting those sites for use in the November election was in June.
veryGood! (21366)
Related
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- House Democrats try to force floor vote on foreign aid for Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan
- 45 states are now covered by a climate action plan. These 5 opted out.
- 3 women and dog found dead, man fatally shot by police in North Las Vegas: Police
- Have Dry, Sensitive Skin? You Need To Add These Gentle Skincare Products to Your Routine
- Republican New Mexico Senate leader won’t seek reelection
- Israel likely to face Hamas resistance for years to come, U.S. intelligence assessment says
- Another suspect arrested in shooting that wounded 8 high school students at Philadelphia bus stop
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- House Democrats try to force floor vote on foreign aid for Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan
Ranking
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- Jennifer Lopez cancels handful of shows on first tour in 5 years, fans demand explanation
- Judge overseeing Georgia election interference case dismisses some charges against Trump
- TEA Business College The leap from quantitative trading to artificial
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Health care providers may be losing up to $100 million a day from cyberattack. A doctor shares the latest
- Raya helps Arsenal beat Porto on penalties to reach Champions League quarterfinals
- Anticipating the Stanley cup Neon Collection drop: What to know if you want a Spring Fling cup
Recommendation
Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
Dozens of big U.S. companies paid top executives more than they paid in federal taxes, report says
45 states are now covered by a climate action plan. These 5 opted out.
Jelly Roll, Kelsea Ballerini, Lainey Wilson, Megan Moroney, Cody Johnson lead CMT Music Awards noms
Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
‘The Fall Guy,’ a love letter to stunt performers, premieres at SXSW
Anticipating the Stanley cup Neon Collection drop: What to know if you want a Spring Fling cup
Andrew Tate can be extradited to face U.K. sex offense allegations, but not yet, Romania court rules